Why is this news at all?
How did we get here?
Listen, your employer supplied you with <<insert device type here>>. What makes you think – even with the assistance of a contractual agreement, that the device, whatever it may be, that they supplied, and paid for, and may also be paying a subscription for, is somehow your private device?
That numbskull masquerading as a police officer should have known better.
And the jurists in the California Republic should have rejected this as what is really is: a laugher, from a dimwit sexting, when he should have purchased a cheapo pager for his amorous forays into cyberspace.
Move along. Nothing to see here.
For the first time in ages, this short-handed Supreme Court makes a correct, as opposed to an extremist, decision.
